fort wayne right Weblog



Posted by zeakster on December 8, 2008

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court has turned down an emergency appeal from a New Jersey man who says President-elect Barack Obama is ineligible to be president because he was a British subject at birth.

The court did not comment on its order Monday rejecting the call by Leo Donofrio of East Brunswick, N.J., to intervene in the presidential election.

Donofrio says that since Obama had dual nationality at birth — his mother was American and his Kenyan father at the time was a British subject — he cannot possibly be a “natural born citizen,” one of the requirements the Constitution lists for eligibility to be president.

Donofrio also contends that two other candidates, Republican John McCain and Socialist Workers candidate Roger Calero, also are not natural-born citizens and thus ineligible to be president.

At least one other appeal over Obama’s citizenship remains at the court. Philip J. Berg of Lafayette Hill, Pa., argues that Obama was born in Kenya, not Hawaii as Obama says and the Hawaii secretary of state has confirmed.

Berg says Obama also may be a citizen of Indonesia, where he lived as a boy. Federal courts in Pennsylvania have dismissed Berg’s lawsuit. Federal courts in Ohio and Washington state have rejected similar lawsuits.

Allegations raised on the Internet say the birth certificate, showing that Obama was born in Hawaii on Aug. 4, 1961, is a fake.

But state officials in Hawaii say they checked health department records and have determined there’s no doubt Obama was born in Hawaii.

The nonpartisan Web site examined the original document and said it does have a raised seal and the usual evidence of a genuine document.

In addition, reproduced an announcement of Obama’s birth, including his parents’ address in Honolulu, that was published in the Honolulu Advertiser on Aug. 13, 1961.

JUST produce it why will he not produce it? im not a conspiracy nut but this just lays the ground work. just turn it over obama what are you hiding?????????


4 Responses to “WHY NOT JUST SHOW IT?”

  1. Jason said

    I have been following this story for the last week, when i stumbled upon the story on another blog. It’s criminal what the media has done to cover this thing up. there is certainly a united communist front against the constitution at all levels of government, as well as in all levels of the national media (to the exception of blogs, where there is still freedom of the press).

    Other stories that have not been reported include:
    1) The storming of Manna Storehouse by the Lagrange ohio SWAT team and USDA(ag) officials.
    No warrant. Automatic weopons used to suppress family (including children)
    2) Re-working of Neighborhood Zoning Ordinances nationwide to eliminate our 4th Amendment Rights

  2. Jason said

    #2 in prior comment includes Fort Wayne

  3. zeakster said

    not sure how the 4th ammnedment applies to number 2

  4. Jason said

    take a look at the provisions for inspection authority. warrants can be issued to inspect residential homes for sanitation or compliance with new ordinance, regardless of the age of the home. this gives probable cause. then anything found while searching is open to scrutiny. Bibles, guns, etc…

    section 152.12

    “C. Provisions for Inspection Authority. The Code Official shall inspect any
    premises or structure, as defined in this Chapter based on the following
    1. The Code Official is authorized and directed to make inspections
    where probable cause exists or with consent of the owner, agent or
    occupant to determine the condition of the premises or structures
    located within the City in order that they may perform their duty of
    safeguarding the health and safety of the occupants of such premises
    or structures and of the general public.
    a) For the purpose of making such inspections, the Code Official
    is authorized to enter, examine and survey at all reasonable
    times all such premises or structures.
    b) In the event the owner or occupant of any such premises or
    structures, or the person in possession, refuses to give the Code
    Official free access for inspection purposes, the Code Official
    may apply for an inspection warrant pursuant to IC 36-7-9-16.
    2. Where conditions of an area, the nature of the premises or structure, or
    a need to conduct an area-wide inspection exists, and where a showing
    of such is made by affidavit, an inspection warrant shall be issued by a
    court of record in Allen County directing the inspection of the property

    3. The Enforcement Authority is authorized and directed to proceed with
    a full inspection of any premises or structure that is deemed to be a
    public nuisance by the fact that it is unsealed, unsecured and vacant.”

    here is link to pdf from city website,com_wrapper/Itemid,1828/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: